remark-lint-strong-marker
remark-lint
rule to warn when strong markers are inconsistent.
Contents
- What is this?
- When should I use this?
- Presets
- Install
- Use
- API
- Recommendation
- Fix
- Examples
- Compatibility
- Contribute
- License
What is this?
This package is a unified (remark) plugin, specifically a remark-lint
rule. Lint rules check markdown code style.
When should I use this?
You can use this package to check that strong markers are consistent.
Presets
This rule is included in the following presets:
Preset | Setting |
---|---|
remark-preset-lint-consistent | 'consistent' |
remark-preset-lint-markdown-style-guide | '*' |
Install
This package is ESM only. In Node.js (version 12.20+, 14.14+, or 16.0+), install with npm:
npm install remark-lint-strong-marker
In Deno with esm.sh
:
import remarkLintStrongMarker from 'https://esm.sh/remark-lint-strong-marker@3'
In browsers with esm.sh
:
<script type="module">
import remarkLintStrongMarker from 'https://esm.sh/remark-lint-strong-marker@3?bundle'
</script>
Use
On the API:
import {remark} from 'remark'
import remarkLint from 'remark-lint'
import remarkLintStrongMarker from 'remark-lint-strong-marker'
import {read} from 'to-vfile'
import {reporter} from 'vfile-reporter'
const file = await read('example.md')
await remark()
.use(remarkLint)
.use(remarkLintStrongMarker)
.process(file)
console.error(reporter(file))
On the CLI:
remark --use remark-lint --use remark-lint-strong-marker example.md
On the CLI in a config file (here a package.json
):
…
"remarkConfig": {
"plugins": [
…
"remark-lint",
+ "remark-lint-strong-marker",
…
]
}
…
API
This package exports no identifiers. The default export is remarkLintStrongMarker
.
unified().use(remarkLintStrongMarker[, config])
This rule supports standard configuration that all remark lint rules accept (such as false
to turn it off or [1, options]
to configure it).
The following options (default: 'consistent'
) are accepted:
'*'
— prefer asterisks'_'
— prefer underscores'consistent'
— detect the first used style and warn when further strong differs
Recommendation
Underscores and asterisks work slightly different: asterisks can form strong in more cases than underscores. Because underscores are sometimes used to represent normal underscores inside words, there are extra rules supporting that. Asterisks can also be used as the marker of more constructs than underscores: lists. Due to having simpler parsing rules, looking more like syntax, and that they can be used for more constructs, it’s recommended to prefer asterisks.
Fix
remark-stringify
formats strong with asterisks by default. Pass strong: '_'
to always use underscores.
Examples
ok.md
In
**foo** and **bar**.
Out
No messages.
also-ok.md
In
__foo__ and __bar__.
Out
No messages.
ok.md
When configured with '*'
.
In
**foo**.
Out
No messages.
ok.md
When configured with '_'
.
In
__foo__.
Out
No messages.
not-ok.md
In
**foo** and __bar__.
Out
1:13-1:20: Strong should use `*` as a marker
not-ok.md
When configured with '💩'
.
Out
1:1: Incorrect strong marker `💩`: use either `'consistent'`, `'*'`, or `'_'`
Compatibility
Projects maintained by the unified collective are compatible with all maintained versions of Node.js. As of now, that is Node.js 12.20+, 14.14+, and 16.0+. Our projects sometimes work with older versions, but this is not guaranteed.
Contribute
See contributing.md
in remarkjs/.github
for ways to get started. See support.md
for ways to get help.
This project has a code of conduct. By interacting with this repository, organization, or community you agree to abide by its terms.